Using Executive Coaching to Leverage Assessment Center Feedback Tips for Success
This presentation adds a unique twist to the
research that has been favorably received by Congress participants over
the last couple of years regarding factors that influence constructive
responses to AC feedback (c.f., Kudisch and colleagues 1998; 2001; 2002;
Wilkinson & Byham, 2003; Eidson, 2003; Atchley Smith, & Hoffman,
2003). This study also extends earlier efforts by Poteet and Kudisch
(2003) who used interview data from senior-level assessors (from both
applied and academic domains) to identify additional factors that
influence AC feedback acceptance and use, and user-proven strategies for
increasing receptivity. The current study integrates research from the
AC and executive coaching domains to explore those “coach
competencies” that help participants gain greater awareness and
improve their performance.
The study is based on interview data from
participants of two universities who received or were receiving
executive coaching as part of their participation in Executive MBA
leadership development programs. One of these university programs
included a mini-assessment center component. Using a job analytic-type
approach, we sought to provide a preliminary detailed taxonomy of
coaching KSAOs, techniques and activities related to coaching
effectiveness. A combined review of the quantitative and qualitative
results revealed four broad factors that comprise effective coaching.
Although the findings are consistent with KSAO lists developed by the
International Coach Federation (ICF), the ability to confront,
challenge, and push seems a bit more emphasized in our study. This is in slight contrast with findings from Poteet
and Kudisch (2003), where AC assessors/coaches warned that challenging
and confronting their clients could lead to defensiveness. Based on the
findings, we believe that executive coaching can be a value-added
supplement to DAC initiatives.
Overall,
this session will provide practitioners with a preliminary taxonomy that
could be used as a screening tool or task inventory checklist to develop
work samples for identifying and evaluating potential coaches (or those
assessors who also serve as coaches in AC designs coupled with an
executive coaching). Similarly, our findings can be used to develop
training programs that provide coaches/assessors serving as coaches with
a broad range of tools. Finally, this taxonomy can be used to provide
participants with a “realistic preview” of what to expect from the
coaching process.
Speaker
Jeff Kudisch, Ph.D.
University of Maryland
Dr.
Jeff Kudisch is a Distinguished Tyser Teaching Fellow and Senior
Executive Education Fellow at the
Jeff
received his Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational (I/O) Psychology from
the
Jeff
has successfully taught in Executive Development programs, EMBA, MBA,
Ph.D., and undergraduate programs. Jeff has been nominated for teaching
awards at the
Jeff
has provided consulting services in the areas of leadership assessment,
succession planning, assessment centers, testing and selection,
executive coaching, training and development, organizational change,
employee attitudes, customer satisfaction, and performance management
(e.g., performance appraisal, multi-source feedback) to both public- and
private-sector organizations in the United States since 1988.
Before venturing into academia, Jeff spent several years working
in various human resource-related functions at the Tennessee Valley
Authority.
Some of his recent consulting and executive development clients
have included McCormick and Company, Inc., Black & Decker, Home
Depot, Lockheed Martin, Litton Ingalls Shipbuilding & Litton Ship
Systems, Nextel, NIH, Office of Personnel Management, Anne Arundel
Health Systems, Imre Communications, Alliant Health Systems, E.K. Fox
& Associates, and the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA),
among others.
Jeff
developed Assessment Centers for the
He
has written articles in the areas of assessment centers, personnel
selection, managerial credibility, charismatic leadership, and
multi-source feedback, and he has presented his research at national and
international conferences. He is a member of the
Speaker
Mark Poteet, Ph.D.
Organization Research & Solutions Inc.
Mark
L. Poteet, Ph.D., received his Bachelor's degree in Psychology and his
Doctorate in Industrial and Organizational Psychology from the
Mark
also maintains a program of research, having written and co-written
several articles on leadership, mentoring, career development, and
performance appraisal that have appeared in the Journal
of Applied Psychology, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Career
Development Quarterly, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Leadership
Quarterly, and Journal
of Business and Psychology. He recently co-authored a chapter
on “Best Practices in Formal Mentoring Programs” in the book Blackwell
Handbook of Mentoring: A Multiple Perspective Approach, and is a
co-author of the upcoming book Designing
Workplace Mentoring Programs: An Evidence-based Approach.
He has also presented his research at the annual conferences for the
Southern Management Association,
Mark
is a member of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology
and the American Psychological Association.
He has worked with such companies as the Tennessee Valley
Authority, Tennessee State Government, Tennessee Assessment Center,
Personnel Assessment Systems, Ohio Casualty Group, Remy International,
NiSource Corporation, PCI Human Resources, Knoxville Utilities Board,
W.N. Lockwood & Associates, Right Management, Veris Industries, UPS,
the Center for Business and Economic Development at Auburn University,
Indiana Housing and Community Development Agency, IUPUI, the Leadership
Development Institute at Indiana University, and Kelley Executive
Partners.

